One of the most important parameters within population genetics is effective population size (Ne). Ne determines how strong genetic drift is within populations, and therefore how weakly selection sorts among genotypes. I'm not going to go through a bunch of examples of why it's such an important parameter (maybe later), suffice to say that Ne calculations can be used to explain results such as the origin of genome complexity as well as establishing divergence times between bacteria (such as here). Slight digression: I absolutely hate when divergence times are put on bacterial lineages. Unlike many eukaryotic taxa, bacterial populations don't leave easily dateable fossils so divergence times are completely based on population genetic estimates.
Which brings me back to Ne. Effective population size is just that, a measurement of population size. The problem I have with using this parameter in microbial populations is that I (and I suspect everyone else) don't have a clue as to what constitutes a microbial population. Huge numbers always get thrown around about how many bacterial cells exist in nature (10 times as many bacterial cells as human cells in the body!). Are all these cells one population? Are all E. coli cells within your colon one population? Any estimation of Ne is just a guess because it's hard to define what a population is and population sizes likely vary over many orders of magnitude. I can be wrong about that, but that's why I'm putting my thoughts out there.
The best place to start tackling this question is in obligate parasites/symbionts. We have good evidence that vertically inherited symbionts such as Buchnera aphidicola have small Ne values because genetic drift has transformed their genomes. Likewise, it might be possible to define what populations are for certain obligate parasites (such as my good friend Helicobacter pylori, which can really only survive inside the human stomach) that are only found in closed environments. Even in cases such as H. pylori, transmission across hosts from stomach to stomach starts to blur the lines between populations. As far as I can tell the situation gets much more difficult to model as you step from generalist pathogens/symbionts to environmental bacteria to spore formers (or persisters) that can survive in environments without growing. What about population subdivision such as in biofilms? What about dramatic lifestyle changes and population bottlenecks such as in Vibrio fischeri. V. fischeri can be found living freely as saprophytes in the open ocean (see link within here), but all it takes is one single bacterium to infect a juvenile squid and be amplified by the billions. Bottlenecking from millions of cells to 1 dramatically altars Ne since calculations of this parameter place extra weight on low numbers.
Unlike what is possible with more visible megafauna, we can't simply go out and perform ecological catch and release studies to estimate population sizes. The best way to think about microbial populations may be, somewhat abstractly, in population genetic terms. If a new mutation arises, what other genotypes are going to affect its rates of fixation or persistance? If genetic variants arise within competing evolutionary backgrounds and directly affect each others frequencies, I take that as good evidence that those competing backgrounds are in the same population. Likewise, if the rates of migration/transmission between hosts or subpopulations significantly affects selection then these subpopulations could be considered parts of a larger whole.
So how do we begin to measure microbial populations? I don't think it's been done yet, (please feel free to correct me!), but the rise of metagenomics at least makes the necessary experiments possible. With these technologies we can measure genotypes over time (all genotypes, not just a culturable subsample). We can measure how genotypes affect frequencies of other genotypes, and interactions could be evidence of existing within the same population. We could measure parameters such as strength of genetic drift and selection over time and extrapolate back to get Ne. Of course we then get into the issue of species level interactions, but I'll definitely save that for another time.
Wednesday, June 27, 2012
I’ve been thinking about starting a blog for a while, but it always seemed like there was too much activation energy involved. I guess that makes Jonathan Eisen my catalyst. I’ve seen what has taken place on Tree of Life (and even participated) as well as a variety of other terrific sites and have gained many insights (list of microbiology related blogs here). Communication with other researchers and the general public is increasingly taking place through social media, and I've been very happy with the types of interactions I've had on twitter. I hope this blog will be useful and fun for some people other than myself, but we’ll see. In the very least it provides a forum to crystalize thoughts so that, even if no one else sees this, I can look back and know where my brain was at.
What’s the content going to be? My research is focused on microbial evolution and my lab at the University of Arizona started a year and a half ago. Given that, I’m probably going to use this blog to give some insight into what life in the lab is like while fully acknowledging that there are a variety of other blogs out there with the very same intent. I love research and I love the thrill of figuring out new things, and will try to relate my research experiences (good and bad). I’m also a fan of arguing during journal clubs. While I was part of very lively journal clubs in grad school, my experiences since have left me wanting a bit. My hope is that I can use this as a forum start some good conversations about microbiology and evolution. Lastly, I really love a good history of science story and blogs provide a unique forum to tell such tales. In the very least I’m going to write about how some of my own papers happened, trials tribulations and all. Hopefully I can inspire some others to contribute as well. Look at this as an experiment, maybe it will work and maybe it wont, but I hope to learn something in the process.